What is the safest distance from the 5G cell Tower?

What is the safest distance from the 5G cell Tower?

If you've ever been through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.

They are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could cause issues for users.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one Gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This could lead to many possible harms, like the appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.

Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a cell phone, you probably know that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the further your location from the tower.

While it sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers might be more vulnerable to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those who lived farther away from the antennas.

But, the study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the biggest organ of the human body, and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds



The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on several assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effects on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves.  https://te.legra.ph/What-is-the-safest-distance-coming-from-a-5G-cell-Tower-system-04-27-2  are not in line with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation. As  what is a safe distance from a cell tower , they should not be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.

Additionally there is  Additional reading  that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their radiation limits for local peak SARs that are based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of radiation exposure. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.