What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower system?

What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower system?

If you've ever walked through a town, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.

They are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still cause problems for people.
safe distance from cell tower  of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy could cause harm to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one Gram of tissue.

But, since  what is a safe distance from a cell tower  operates at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. This could result in various possible harms, like the formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.

Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure


If you've ever operated a cell phone, then you're aware that the safest location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the farther you are from it.

While it sounds like something that's good but the truth is that people who live close to towers could be more prone to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that those who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those who lived farther away from the antennas.

But, the study revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, used in wireless communications, may penetrate the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the most important organ of the human body, and is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the false belief that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

The assumption is also ignoring the greater penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals and the consequences of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such  safe distance from cell tower  shouldn't be used for health protective exposure guidelines.

In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.