What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower system?

What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower system?

If you've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can cause issues for users.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices.  what is a safe distance from a cell tower  are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy can be harmful to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This can lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in formation of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that a safe distance from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the further the tower is.

Although this may sound like an ideal idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For  safe distance from cell tower , a study from 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50m of cell towers had much more health problems than those who lived farther far from antennas.


However, this study also revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, may penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the largest organ in the human body. It is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. They include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

The assumption is also ignoring the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines.

Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs that are based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight.  https://pastelink.net/wg79nzvz  of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.