What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell Structure?

What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell Structure?

If  https://rentry.co/pkw3a 've ever walked through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can cause issues for users.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.

safe distance to live from cell phone tower  (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body areas. This can lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.

Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever operated a cell phone, then you're aware that the safest location from the tower is around 400 meters. This is because the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the farther your location from the tower.

While it sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers might be more vulnerable to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those living further away from the antennas.

This study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communications, may be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin serves as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. The skin is the biggest organ in the human body. It is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on a variety of assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. They include the false belief that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).

The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effects on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed.  http://www.med.alexu.edu.eg/ssc/members/floodexpert7/activity/1333962/  are not compatible with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.



In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This would result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.