Very best safest distance from a 5G cell Structure?

If you've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.

The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could cause problems for people.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one Gram of tissue.

However, because  safe distance to live from cell phone tower  transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.

Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a cell phone, then you're aware that a safe location from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the further the tower is.

While this sounds like a good idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more vulnerable to health problems. For  safe distance from cell tower , a study from 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those who were away from the antennas.

However, this study also revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communications, may penetrate the body's outer layer of skin. This is important to understand since the skin serves as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ in the human body and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on several assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the effect on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.

Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict their radiation limits for local peak SARs, based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This would result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.