Are usually safest distance coming from a 5G cell System?
If you've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could cause problems for people.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF can cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, but not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever operated a cell phone, then you're aware that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the further away the tower is.
While this sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that those living close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther far from antennas.
But, the study revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower is due to the fact that RF radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. safe distance from cell tower is crucial to know because the skin acts as a shield against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the biggest organ of the human body, and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on several assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. https://nonon-centsnanna.com/members/dresslink0/activity/130224/ include the erroneous assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effects on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.
Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs, based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This could result in the risk of having adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.